I am among the first to jump in and defend the military. I spent a couple of years in the Navy and wouldn’t trade that for anything in the world as far as growing up, taking responsibility, exercising authority, and learning that I was part of a whole nation.
But it seems to me that we now have a professional army to do the biding of our country. And there is little connection between Congress and the huge majority of people in this country and what that professional military is asked to do, or is doing, kind of like the professional character of the Roman legions towards the end of the Roman empire.
We are paying them, we hardly ever see them, they are not the sons and daughters of our friends and neighbors, our own sons and daughters, brothers, sisters, wives, sweethearts.
Please don’t misunderstand me. The soldiers (a generic term I am using for all the armed services) ARE husbands, wives, sweethearts, moms and dads, brothers and sisters to a few of us. And possibly we all CARE in a general sense, applaud them (like in the Budweiser commercial) when they come through the airports, going home or deploying.
A round of applause for our fighting men (again, a useful term for all soldiers). Sorry, I’m not P. C.
But we don’t have a STAKE in this fight. Fewer than 5 % of Congress have family in the military. We recruit them, train them, pay them well and send them off to fight. And if they get wounded or are killed, we feel bad, but it doesn’t strike most of us viscerally, right in the gut, because for most of us, we are at a remove from this professional army.
If indeed we are at war, as the last president and the present president loudly have proclaimed, then we ought to ALL be in this war. We can’t win it with a professional army, detached from the emotion and commitment of the whole nation.
To do this, we need a universal conscription. Sorry, here is the “D” word. We need the draft.
What do you think?
Ellen Moon
January 27, 2010
Professor,
I started to say that a war should be something important enough that we are all in it together, but I remember what I have been taught about the Revolutionary War. (Only a third of the population was for fighting.) I suspect that the US is still trying to figure out who our enemy is or how to tell me (the general public) who our enemy is.
Show me the enemy, the cause, the threat and then hand me a gun. I’m not too old to take a hill.
Ellen
P.S. The “d” word. Instead of the “d” word…why don’t we all just serve a couple of years right after highschool? At the very least, we would start a life with a little more discipline and having been a few more places than just our own backyard.
LikeLike
Henry A. Grffin
February 11, 2010
I believe Prof. Clayton is correct. I served in the Army and regret that today of 80 mostly young people in my office I am the only person who served in the military. I believe that to reinstate the universal draft in the U.S. would be good for America (and the world). It is the the way of and to democracy.
LikeLike
Henry A. Grffin
February 12, 2010
As stated, we would all benefit from and be more involved in the military affairs an events of our ountry if larger, more representative segments of our society would serve to defend our freedoms and foreign and domestic political objectives.
LikeLike